Wednesday, December 18, 2013

'We will have a fire': arson during eighteenth-century enclosures


Join our Winter Solstice Blog Hop! Thirty writers throw light on a dazzling range of topics. Follow the links at the end of this article to be enlightened and brightened by our blogs... 





“Inclosure came and trampled on the grave
Of labours rights and left the poor a slave
And memorys pride ere want to wealth did bow
Is both the shadow and the substance now.”  

John Clare, The Mores 
 
On 1 May 1794, the writer Hester (Thrale) Piozzi of Streatham Park recorded in her diary that the furze on the common had been set on fire in protest at the enclosure of land “which really & of just Right belonged to the poor of the Parish”. Yet even while she acknowledged that the protesters had justice on their side, she criticised them for not “going to Law like wise fellows” and concluded: “So senseless are Le Peuple, & so unfitted to be souverain”.

The senseless poor of Streatham were not unique. During the eighteenth century, enclosure resisters throughout the country tore down fences, damaged gardens, greenhouses and orchards, destroyed trees, broke windows, fired guns at enclosers, attacked land surveyors, sabotaged farm equipment and blocked roads. Most sensationally of all, they torched houses, barns and hayricks.  

What possessed them to commit arson – a capital crime – instead of “going to Law”?

Le Peuple

Picture a farm labourer in the eighteenth century: we’ll call him Jack Straw. Not only is Jack’s work hard, it’s also seasonal. If he had to rely on his wages alone, his family would have starved long ago. Luckily his village has some common land where Jack and his family gather fuel for heating and cooking. They keep a cow and a pig which they graze on the common. They forage for food: berries, mushrooms, nuts and herbs. Sometimes they sell some of the produce they’ve harvested in local markets to bring in a bit of extra income. They gather rushes to make tallow candles and thatch their cottage.

Jack isn’t the only villager who depends on the common. Local tradesmen such as blacksmiths or bakers use it to supplement their incomes during slack periods. Smallholders pasture their livestock on it. Part of the land is set aside to provide income for charitable purposes so even the poorest in the parish benefit.

No-one owns the common, but that doesn’t mean it’s first grab, first served. The village has appointed officers to regulate the way the land is used. They make sure no one takes more than he’s entitled to, that the land isn’t over-grazed, that ditches are cleared and animal carcasses are removed, that ponds are kept clean. Jack knows he will be fined if he breaks the rules. 

So there’s Jack Straw, working hard but getting by, keeping his family off the parish poor relief or out of the workhouse. Then one day a notice appears on the church door: the common is going to be enclosed by Act of Parliament. There’ll be no more wood for the fire or rushes for the thatch, and Jack will have to get rid of his cow and pig because he can’t afford to buy feed. Jack Straw and his family are going to be a lot worse off in the days to come.  

Of just Right belonged to the poor of the Parish 

The effect of an Enclosure Act was to eradicate commons rights, leaving the no-man’s-land that remained available for distribution amongst the landowners. In order to obtain an Enclosure Act, the promoters had to secure the consent of the majority of land owners in the parish. Since consent was weighted by how much land each signatory owned, it was possible for one large landowner to give consent.  

A solicitor was employed to draw up a Bill. When the Bill reached Parliament it was referred to a committee for consideration. The committee looked at matters such as the compensation to be paid for loss of commons rights, the distribution of the land, and provision for payment of tithes.  

It looks like due process, but in fact it was heavily weighted in favour of the enclosers. There was only one stage at which objections could be lodged, and that was when the Bill reached committee. So when Hester Piozzi wondered why the poor of the parish didn’t go to Law, she’s wondering why they didn’t employ a solicitor to draw up their petition in the due form and present it to the committee. (Petitions which were not in due form were ignored.)  

Going to law like wise fellows 

Well, why didn’t they?  

Mrs Piozzi herself provides the clue.  

They were the poor of the parish. They couldn’t pay a solicitor to draft their petition, or retain counsel to represent them in committee. They could not afford to go to London and lobby MPs, and even if they could how could they negotiate a system from which they were completely excluded? Most of them couldn’t even write.  

It is no wonder, then, that so few petitions were presented to enclosure committees. In Nottinghamshire, for example, of 171 enclosures, only nine were the subject of counter-petitions, and the petitioners included an earl, land owners and “gentlemen”.  

What’s more, the land owners had more than legal technicalities on their side. They had force. They could get away with including clauses in Enclosure Bills imposing the death penalty on resisters. They could call on the army to help them enforce enclosure – as they did in Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire and Cambridgeshire.  

A mist of flames 

Jack Straw and his neighbours have no connection with the great men of Parliament, or the enclosure committees which are packed with land owners and their friends. What can they do to make their objections known?  

They can light up the night sky with protest. Arson, or the threat of arson, is one of their most potent weapons. They can promise farmers who deprive them of their rights that “As soon as your corn is in the barn we will have a fire” (anonymous letter sent to an Essex farmer, 1773). They can warn those who “intend of incloseing our Commond fields” that they will wake in their beds in a “mist of flames” (anonymous letter sent to Oliver Cromwell of Cheshunt Park, 1799).  

So Jack Straw is going to go out one night with a tinder box in his pocket. He’s going to set fire to a hay rick. If he’s caught, he’ll hang.  

Senseless Jack Straw.


I am currently working on a novel set during the eighteenth-century enclosures. Murder, riot - and arson!

Here are some more blogs on the theme of "Casting Light Upon the Darkness"

(Note: Links will go live on 21 December 2013):-

Helen Hollick - A little light relief concerning those dark reviews! Plus prize giveaway.

Prue Batten - Casting Light...

Alison Morton - Shedding Light on the Roman Dusk Plus a Giveaway Prize!

Anna Belfrage - Let there be light!

Beth Elliott - Steering by the Stars: Stratford Canning in Constantinople, 1810-12

Melanie Spiller - Lux Aeterna, the chant of eternal light

Janet Reedman - The Winter Solstice Monuments

Petrea Burchard - Darkness - how did people of the past cope with the dark? Plus a Giveaway Prize!

Richard Denning - The Darkest Years of the Dark Ages: what do we really know? Plus a giveway prize!

Pauline Barclay - Shedding Light on a Traditional Pie

David Ebsworth - Propaganda in the Spanish Civil War

David Pilling - Greek Fire Plus a Giveaway Prize!

Debbie Young - Fear of the Dark

Derek Birks - Lies, Damned Lies and...Chronicles

Mark Patton - Casting Light on Saturnalia

Tim Hodkinson - Soltice@Newgrange

Wendy Percival - Ancestors in the Spotlight

Judy RidgeleySanta and his Elves Plus a Giveaway Prize 

Suzanne McLeod - The Dark of the Moon

Katherine Bone - Admiral Nelson, A Light in Dark Times

Christina Courtney - The Darkest Night of the Year

Edward James - The secret life of Christopher Columbus; Which Way to Paradise?

Janis Pegrum Smith - Into the Light - A Short Story

Julian Stockwin - Ghost Ships - Plus a Giveaway Present!

Manda Scott - Dark into Light - Mithras, and the older gods

Pat Bracewell - Anglo-Saxon Art: Splendor in the Dark

Lucienne Boyce - 'We will have a fire' - 18th century protests against enclosure

Nicole Evelina - What Lurks Beneath Glastonbury Abbey?

Sky Purington - How the Celts Cast Light on Current American Christmas Traditions

Stuart MacAllister (Sir Read A Lot) - The Darkness of Depression

23 comments:

  1. Fascinating, Lucienne! I never knew any of this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Petrea. When I was at school enclosure was taught as a very dry, boring period of "social history" - when I think it was one of the greatest scandals of all time!

      Delete
  2. Great post, Lucienne. I saw at first hand how "common land" is still appropriated by big companies and government this way in Colombia with campesino peasant farmers driven from their homes and into the slums of Bógota and elsewhere, or shot by death squads or the military when they protested. I heard some of those protests condemned as "senseless" too!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Dave. History repeats itself...many of Britain's agricultural workers also ended up in city slums. Such a tragedy.

      Delete
  3. Great inspiration for a novel, Lucienne! Good luck with it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Wendy, it's a fascinating period of history I think.

      Delete
  4. Very interesting and as anything been learnt over the centuries? Yes and no! Thank you for a superb post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. I fear little has been learned - which is one reason for making sure history isn't forgotten I think!

      Delete
  5. What a great inspiration for a novel, Lucienne! Good luck with it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. My goodness, how did they get away with it?! Having read your clear and calm explanation, I can see now that on a scale of national scandal, it's practically up there with the slave trade - and of course reminiscent of the Highland Clearances north of the border. And how do they make it sound so dull in school history lessons when, as you have told it, it is such a human, interesting story - no-one could read your rational explanation without being incensed on the behalf of the poor. Looking forward to reading your novel now!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Debbie! Working hard on the novel...I do feel very strongly about these land enclosures. Think how different things might be if we hadn't been robbed of our commons! Now there's a what if novel hoving into view...

      Delete
  7. Your account is definitely alive, unlike the version I remember from school. I've seen elderly peasant women grazing their one cow on a bit of common in Romanian villages. That reinforces how desperately poor folk need some extra means to help them survive.

    I think your novel will paint a vivid picture of this sad period in our history.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hallo Beth, thanks for your encouraging reply. I've seen the same in Turkey - people using roadsides etc to graze animals. Such things can be a vital part of people's survival.

      Delete
  8. Very interesting, Lucienne. A rather forceful reminder of just how deep the social divides were - and most of us would have been Straw babies, i.e. the "senseless Peuple".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hallo Anna, thank you for this. Yes, we would definitely have been lumped with the senseless. It's exactly what the suffragettes were called as well.

      Delete
  9. It was definitely scandalous and makes you wonder how the landowners could be so short-sighted! They should have known the consequences and it must have made them feel very unsafe for quite a long time with all those threats being made. Fascinating post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hallo Christina, thanks for your comment. Yes, it was a violent time, what with invasion threats and mutiny in the navy and army as well, not to mention the hounding of radicals...a very interesting time for a novel I think!

      Delete
  10. Thanks for posting this. I knew little about this period of time, and you have brought it very much to life

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Janet, I think it is a very lively period!

      Delete
  11. Very enjoyable, Lucienne - enclosure has a lot to answer for, and was the direct cause of my men ending up breaking their backs as navvies a few decades down the line.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Janis, you are so right, thanks for making the connection. I loved your story.

      Delete
  12. This has been such a fascination Blog Hop - such a variety of articles! Thanks for this one - most interesting!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Helen, and thanks too for organising the blog hop. A fascinating day!

      Delete